scheur.com home
 
Find It Fast About S&A S&A Services S&A Clients S&A Resources Search S&A

  Home >

 

Send this issue to a friend

Insider Issue
November/December 2001
September/October 2001
July/August 2001
May/June 2001
March/April 2001
January/February 2001
November/December 2000
September/October 2000
July/August 2000
May/June 2000
February/March 2000
December 1999
September 1999
July 1999
May 1999
March 1999
Insider Archives Index

SMG Managed Care Insider Home

Vol. 1. No. 4


September 1999

In This Issue...

Insider Vision by Barry Scheur

Insider Perspective: Meeting Compliance, One Person's View

Readers Write In




Visit our Website:
www.scheur.com

--- The Managed Care ---
I N S I D E R

is published six times a year by
The Scheur Management Group, Inc.
One Gateway Center, Suite 810
Newton, MA 02458
617 969-7500 * 617 969-7508
Email: insider@scheur.com

Publisher ... Barry S. Scheur
Editor ... Ruth M. Aaron
Research ... Judith A. Jaffe

Production Coordinator
Nancy K. Belle

©2002 By The Scheur Management

Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction by any means of any
portion of The Managed Care Insider
without prior permission is strictly
prohibited. We welcome your
comments and suggestions.

ISSN 1523-6110

SMG Logo - SMG Home
 
Insider Perspective: Meeting Compliance, One Person's View

An interview with Lee Paragus, J.D., Compliance Officer, Mount Carmel Health Plan

Perhaps the best way to gain per-spective about the compliance function is to hear firsthand about the experience of one HMO through the eyes of its compliance officer. The Insider presents an inter-view with Lee Paragas, J.D., Compliance Officer of Mount Carmel Health Plan (MCHP), conducted by Catherine Hill, Vice President of Scheur Management Group (SMG).

MCHP received designation by the Health Care Financing Agency (HCFA) in early 1997 to be a part of its Medicare+Choices demonstration project. MCHP contracted with SMG to assist in obtaining the necessary licenses and regulatory approvals and to build and manage the business through its first few months of opera-tions. MCHP was licensed by the State of Ohio to operate as an HMO in October 1996, began marketing to Medicare beneficiaries in April 1997, and currently has 13,000 enrollees in the MediGold Medicare+Choices pro-gram. Paragas is responsible for MCHP's compliance program and reports directly to the CEO.

"Many managed care organizations don't understand compliance, what it should consist of, who should be responsible for developing and imple-menting it, how it interfaces with internal functions and external enti-ties, and the consequences of not having an effective program," Paragas begins. "Shortly after MCHP's MediGold program began serving its enrollees, the CEO realized the impor-tance of this function and the level at which it must operate within an HMO in order to be effective. He created the compliance department and I was hired."


CH: What is your primary responsibility?

LP: The responsibility of the MCHP compliance department is to ensure that we are compliant with all federal and state laws and regulations per-taining to our Medicare business. Since we only serve Medicare benefi-ciaries, we organized the departmen-tal functions to address several areas that are deemed essential by HCFA as it monitors Medicare+Choices programs.

For Medicare programs, we must ensure compliance in these key areas:

1. Beneficiaries receive all medically necessary services to which they are entitled.

2. The organization does not selectively market its program (i.e., market only to those healthier beneficiaries who utilize less services, representing lower than average annual cost).

3. Provider compensation, and especially the risk-sharing mechanisms, are not structured to provide incentives to withhold medically necessary services.

4. Marketing and sales materials provide important beneficiary information in a clear and succinct manner, neither over- or under-promising, nor excluding key components of the benefit package and requirements.

5. Providers or medical personnel do not initiate discussions concerning disenrollment.

These issues seem straightforward but, given the many participants in the Medicare Risk program, all of MCHP's staff members, our written materials, and the employees of our provider network, it is obvious that there are many places where inaccu-rate information could be given to members and providers, many oppor-tunities to err in communications or actions, and the need to pay careful attention to all aspects of program-matic requirements. Unfortunately, there are managed care organizations that are not fully in compliance. This creates a negative public perception about all of us, placing us under extreme regulatory and public scrutiny and suspicion, making our jobs even more difficult.

CH: Why is compliance so important?

LP: Managed care organizations that contract with HCFA have been delegated the federal government's responsibility to serve and protect beneficiaries. These are contractual requirements and must be followed to the letter of the law and/or regulation.

CH: What is the most important issue that supports your efforts as compliance officer?

LP: The support of the CEO, the board of directors and the entire man-aged care organization staff is critical for a compliance program to be successful. All must understand that compliance is critically important and that it needs to be taken seriously.

CH: What other aspects of the program are you responsible for?

LP: I am responsible for disclosing to HCFA any action or issue that would cause MCHP to be non-compliant with our contract. I am also an inter-nal resource for MCHP staff and con-tracted providers and vendors. I have the responsibility for developing the compliance program, overseeing audits, monitoring activities and reporting to HCFA on an established calendar.

CH: What makes you effective in your role?

LP: I am very visible and available to MCHP staff, keeping an open door policy, encouraging everyone to bring to my attention any real, perceived or potential violation. By reporting directly to the CEO and having the ear of the board of directors, I have the authority to act immediately and decisively if an issue arises. I inform management, staff and the board of the status of issues. I am an "expert" resource to them in explaining and operationalizing requirements. I believe in continuous education and training of the staff and board of directors.

CH: What are some pointers you would give to others who are in the process of establishing a compliance function in their organization ?

LP: Here are a few necessary components for a good working compliance program:

1. Hire an experienced consultant who knows about compliance and has an established track record of implementing successful programs. It is difficult to establish the function, educate the staff, and complete the auditing, monitoring and reporting all at the same time you are learning yourself what is expected.

2. The compliance officer needs to report at the highest level of the organization, to either the CEO and/or the board of directors.

3. There needs to be adequate financial support for the department, especially in terms of personnel. It is too critical a function to under-staff. The potential fines justify this alone. One person cannot provide the necessary compliance functions.

4. Buy-in from the staff, CEO and board to facilitate the adoption of the code of conduct required for its compliance program.

5. Continuous education and training, including the use of video's that provide examples of issues for staff and providers.

6. Audit, monitor, and report on a regular basis and in a timely manner.

7. Keep the compliance program in front of the staff and board of directors.

8. Keep current; focus on the key areas of vulnerability or liability.

9. Utilize the HCFA and OIG websites on the Internet daily.

10. Form a compliance committee that meets on a regular basis and represents all key areas of the organization, especially those most vulnerable to non-compliance.

CH: Have you found it an asset to be an attorney in your role as compliance officer?

LP: Yes, it has been helpful. There probably are organizations where the "inside" counsel acts also as the compliance officer, but I believe that asking one person to have responsibility for these two major roles is a very difficult challenge. With my legal training and experience, I understand the federal and state regulations and can do the necessary research. However, this has drawbacks, in that part of my time is taken by doing what an external counsel could do in interpreting legal/regulatory documents. Therefore I have less time to establish and maintain the operational processes and procedures for the organization.

CH: What is your focus in the near future?

LP: My focus will be on finalizing our compliance program and making changes in our current program to meet new regulatory requirements. Since MCHP is owned by a hospital system, we can take advantage of the hospital's policies, processes and mechanisms for compliance (e.g., the hospital system already has a "hot line" for reporting), but there are inherent differences between the hospital system's focus and requirements, and those of a managed care organization.

CH: What do you think are the important elements of staff education?

LP: I found that providing information about the Medicare program is the first step so that all staff will have a common understanding of why HCFA believes compliance is so important. Understanding that MediCare is an entitlement, with a trust fund for beneficiaries, provides the essential framework that is an important distinction in managed care organizations that offer both MediCare+Choices programs and other products. Using this approach, I found that the staff were receptive to these educational sessions. They have expressed their appreciation for providing this perspective about why certain steps must be taken to protect the beneficiaries. Another method I use is "train the trainers." By training the managers and directors, they can in turn train their staff and any new staff who are hired.

CH: Do you see areas for compliance that HCFA is not yet monitoring?

LP: No, I believe HCFA has identified and is monitoring all areas that are critical to protecting beneficiaries.

Editor's Note: Other managed care organizations need to take into consideration the statutory and other requirements of other payors as well, e.g., Medicaid, Workers Compensation and commercial insurers, and structure their operations to include these essential requirements.

Comments From Readers?

If you have any suggestions or comments on this topic that you would like to share with The Insider's readers, email them to mailto:Insider@scheur.com with COMPLIANCE in the subject.


Back to The Insider Index





Site Map | Contact Us | Site Policy | Search


Scheur & Associates, Inc.
One Gateway Center, Suite 810
Newton, MA 02458

Copyright 2003, Scheur & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.